ABot ORAN Test Solution

Validate every O-RAN function.
Then prove the AI that runs it.

ABot tests DU, CU, RIC and SMO stacks across the control, user and management planes, simulating whatever is missing. Now it can also act as an independent referee for the xApps and rApps that make decisions on your RAN.

O-RAN Alliance-compliant test cases Real and simulated NFs English-like test language Cloud-native, runs on OpenShift
CU · DU · RIC · SMOsimulated to build a wraparound
F1 · E1 · E2 · O1plus N1/N2/N3, N6 and Xn
C · U · Mplanes validated in one run
1platform to test, analyse and trust
Wraparound testing

Any O-RAN function, real or simulated

Bring the device under test. ABot simulates the rest of the topology and drives O-RAN and 3GPP test cases across every interface.

SMO Non-RT RIC your rApps A1 Near-RT RIC 10 ms to 1 s loops your xApps E2 E2 O1 DU F1 CU-CP ⇄ CU-UP E1 between them N2 / N3 5G Core N6 traffic: video, IMS Neighbour gNB Xn
ABot-simulated or your device under testYour AI apps, checked by Trust Assurance

Real and simulated, mixed

Interwork real and simulated NFs to build any wraparound topology.

Ready test repository

3GPP and O-RAN WG-compliant cases, written in English-like language.

Traffic on top

Video and IMS traffic simulation over the full end-to-end path.

Specification coverage

O-RAN Stack Interoperability Test Spec 5.0 F1 / E1: 3GPP TS 38.401 M-Plane, O1: O-RAN WG8 IOT v04.00 E2 and RIC: O-RAN WG3 E2TS v01.00.05
Trust Assurance for xApps and rApps

An xApp that steers traffic is making live decisions. Prove it gets them right.

xApps and rApps close the loop on a live RAN. ABot recreates a RAN condition with a known cause, lets your app respond, then checks the decision and its effect against deterministic evidence. All before go-live.

1 · ABOT Create a known condition load, congestion, NF fault, KPI drift 2 · YOUR xAPP / rAPP Decide and act E2 control · A1 policy · O1 config 3 · ABOT AI Check against evidence ground truth + KPIs + call flows 4 · OUTCOME Trust scorecard certify, retune or block next scenario
Sample trust scorecard

What gets measured

Right detection?vs the injected condition
Right action?vs the expected policy or control
No collateral damage?neighbour cells and slices
Did KPIs recover?throughput, latency, drops
Plays well with others?conflicts with other apps
Still true next release?regression in CI

xApps

Near-RT RIC · 10 ms to 1 s
  • Is the E2 control decision right for the condition?
  • Does it hold up under load and handover churn?
  • Does it clash with another xApp on the same cells?

rApps

Non-RT RIC in SMO · over 1 s
  • Do A1 policies produce the intended RAN outcome?
  • Are O1 configuration changes safe and reversible?
  • Has the ML model drifted since the last release?

Example app types to put through the loop

Traffic steeringEnergy saving QoS and slice assuranceMobility optimisation Anomaly detectionLoad balancing

Training data too, not just tests. The O-RAN WG2 AI/ML workflow says a model should be trained and tested before it's deployed. The ABot Scenario Factory generates labelled RAN and Core scenarios with a known cause, so your models learn from operational experience, not only from documents.

xApp and rApp developers

Benchmark your app on known-cause scenarios and show buyers the scorecard.

RIC and SMO vendors, SIs

Onboard third-party apps with a repeatable acceptance gate.

Operators

An independent second opinion before any app gets control of live cells.

Read more: Optimize RAN operations using RIC, on delivering O-RAN use cases with xApps and rApps · Trust Assurance on the ABot AI page
AI-driven RCA for disaggregated RAN

When a multi-vendor RAN breaks, find out exactly where

ABot AI correlates artefacts from every split of the RAN and the Core with deterministic telecom engines first. The LLM only explains evidence that's already been checked.

1IngestPCAPs, NF logs, KPIs and cloud telemetry from DU, CU, RIC and Core
2CorrelateCross-layer, multi-protocol, against how a healthy procedure runs
3PinpointWhich split, which interface, which message, which timestamp
4Explain and fixRoot cause, impact and fix steps, with the evidence attached

Monolithic and disaggregated

The same analysis for a single gNB or a split DU/CU deployment.

RAN and Core interop

gNB and DU/CU interoperability with the Core, end to end.

Same answer every run

Deterministic first, so findings are repeatable and auditable.

Who uses ABot ORAN

Built for every team in an open RAN

System integrators

Multi-vendor interop testing before and after deployment, across distributed networks.

OEMs

Wraparound testing of DUTs, with performance across MEC and edge deployment models.

Operators

Continuous E2E testing, network audits, scale tests and zero-touch test assurance.

Sample case studies

Aarna Networks

Multi-vendor DU, CU, RIC and SMO validation on the C, U and M planes, cloud-native.

Know more →
Capgemini

Network slice analysis of multi-vendor O-RAN and 5G NFs for E2E call flow debugging.

Know more →
Red Hat

O-RAN workload placement and performance benchmarking on OpenShift.

Know more →

Put your xApp through the loop

Book a session to run your RIC app against known-cause scenarios.

Schedule a demo